8R9 R.8.9 29 8.RI.8 RI.8.8 ELAGSE8RI8 8.RI.IKI.8 8.RI.9 RI.8.9 ELAGSE8RI9 RI.8.9 8.RI.IKI.9 8R8 R.8.8 CC.1.2.8.H      E08.B-C.3.1.1 8.RC.15.RI 8.RC.16.RI 8.T.C.2.b 8.T.T.3.a

Persuasive Arguments and Claims 8th Grade

Alabama Course of Study Standards: 29
Read, analyze, and evaluate texts from science, social studies, and other academic disciplines to determine how those disciplines treat domain-specific vocabulary and content organization.
Arizona Academic Standards: 8.RI.8 Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.8 Georgia Math and ELA Standards: ELAGSE8RI8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims and the reasoning is sound.
Arizona Academic Standards: 8.RI.9 Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.9 Georgia Math and ELA Standards: ELAGSE8RI9 Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.9
Analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.
New Jersey Student Learning Standards: RI.8.9
Analyze and reflect on (e.g. practical knowledge, historical/cultural context, and background knowledge) two or more texts that provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.
Pennsylvania Core Standards: CC.1.2.8.H
Evaluate an author’s argument, reasoning, and specific claims for the soundness of the arguments and the relevance of the evidence.
Pennsylvania Core Standards: E08.B-C.3.1.1
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
Arkansas Academic Standards: 8.RC.15.RI
Evaluate the argument and supporting claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is logical, if the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims, and when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
Arkansas Academic Standards: 8.RC.16.RI
Analyze two or more texts that present conflicting information on the same topic, identifying where the texts diverge on matters of fact or interpretation.
Georgia Math and ELA Standards: 8.T.C.2.b
Identify an author’s bias and determine how that bias impacts text credibility. (I)
Georgia Math and ELA Standards: 8.T.T.3.a
Analyze the development of argumentative techniques used to present and design content, including an author’s claim, supporting relevant and logical evidence, an identified counterclaim, a rebuttal, and a conclusion that logically follows the argument. (I)

Persuasive Arguments and Claims

Alabama Course of Study Standards: 29

Read, analyze, and evaluate texts from science, social studies, and other academic disciplines to determine how those disciplines treat domain-specific vocabulary and content organization.

Arizona Academic Standards: 8.RI.8

Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.8

Georgia Math and ELA Standards: ELAGSE8RI8

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.8

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims and the reasoning is sound.

Arizona Academic Standards: 8.RI.9

Common Core State Standards: Literacy.RI.8.9

Georgia Math and ELA Standards: ELAGSE8RI9

Tennessee Academic Standards: 8.RI.IKI.9

Analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.

New Jersey Student Learning Standards: RI.8.9

Analyze and reflect on (e.g. practical knowledge, historical/cultural context, and background knowledge) two or more texts that provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation.

Pennsylvania Core Standards: CC.1.2.8.H

Evaluate an author’s argument, reasoning, and specific claims for the soundness of the arguments and the relevance of the evidence.

Pennsylvania Core Standards: E08.B-C.3.1.1

Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Arkansas Academic Standards: 8.RC.15.RI

Evaluate the argument and supporting claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is logical, if the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support the claims, and when irrelevant evidence is introduced.

Arkansas Academic Standards: 8.RC.16.RI

Analyze two or more texts that present conflicting information on the same topic, identifying where the texts diverge on matters of fact or interpretation.

Georgia Math and ELA Standards: 8.T.C.2.b

Identify an author’s bias and determine how that bias impacts text credibility. (I)

Georgia Math and ELA Standards: 8.T.T.3.a

Analyze the development of argumentative techniques used to present and design content, including an author’s claim, supporting relevant and logical evidence, an identified counterclaim, a rebuttal, and a conclusion that logically follows the argument. (I)

Processing Request...